Contingencies Involved in Rule-Governed Behavior

Rule-governed behavior is a type of behavior that is controlled by verbally mediated rules rather than immediate contingencies. It is influenced by the verbal description of antecedent-behavior-consequence contingencies. In this article, we will explore the two main contingencies involved in rule-governed behavior based on information from several reputable sources.

Verbal Mediation

One of the key contingencies involved in rule-governed behavior is verbal mediation. Rule-governed behavior is under the control of a verbally mediated rule, which means that the behavior is influenced by the verbal description of an antecedent-behavior-consequence contingency. This contingency relies on the individual’s ability to understand and follow verbal instructions or rules.

For example, consider the rule of looking both ways before crossing the street. This rule is verbally taught to individuals as a safety measure. By following this rule, individuals are less likely to be hit by a car. The behavior of looking both ways before crossing the street is maintained by the verbally mediated rule, even in the absence of immediate negative consequences. Verbal mediation allows individuals to engage in rule-governed behavior based on the information conveyed through language.

Insensitivity to Immediate Contingencies

Another important contingency involved in rule-governed behavior is the insensitivity to immediate contingencies. Rule-governed behavior is not directly influenced by immediate consequences of the behavior. Individuals who engage in rule-governed behavior may continue to engage in a behavior even if there are no immediate negative consequences because they have been taught a rule that states the behavior could lead to negative outcomes.

For instance, imagine a person who has been taught a rule that smoking cigarettes can lead to serious health problems. Despite not experiencing immediate negative consequences from smoking, this individual may still refrain from smoking due to the rule they have learned. The behavior of not smoking is maintained by the verbally mediated rule, which overrides the immediate contingencies.

In conclusion, rule-governed behavior is controlled by verbally mediated rules and is not directly influenced by immediate contingencies. Verbal mediation allows individuals to follow rules based on the information conveyed through language, and the insensitivity to immediate contingencies means that individuals may engage in or avoid certain behaviors based on rules, even in the absence of immediate consequences.

Sources:

FAQs

What is rule-governed behavior?

Rule-governed behavior is a type of behavior that is controlled by verbally mediated rules rather than immediate contingencies. It involves following instructions or rules based on the verbal description of antecedent-behavior-consequence contingencies.

How does verbal mediation influence rule-governed behavior?

Verbal mediation plays a crucial role in rule-governed behavior. It refers to the influence of verbal descriptions or rules on behavior. Verbal instructions or rules provide information about the contingencies associated with specific behaviors, shaping individuals’ behavior even in the absence of immediate consequences.

What is meant by insensitivity to immediate contingencies in rule-governed behavior?

Insensitivity to immediate contingencies is a characteristic of rule-governed behavior. It means that rule-governed behavior is not directly influenced by immediate consequences. Individuals may continue to engage in or avoid certain behaviors based on rules, even if there are no immediate positive or negative consequences.

How does rule-governed behavior differ from contingency-shaped behavior?



Rule-governed behavior and contingency-shaped behavior are two distinct forms of behavior control. Rule-governed behavior is controlled by verbally mediated rules, while contingency-shaped behavior is shaped by direct consequences. Rule-governed behavior relies on following rules based on verbal instructions, whereas contingency-shaped behavior is influenced by immediate reinforcements or punishments.

Can rule-governed behavior override immediate contingencies?

Yes, rule-governed behavior can override immediate contingencies. Individuals who have learned rules may engage in or avoid certain behaviors despite the absence of immediate consequences. The verbally mediated rules take precedence and guide behavior, even when immediate contingencies suggest a different course of action.

Are there any drawbacks to rule-governed behavior?

One drawback of rule-governed behavior is that it can be less efficient than behavior shaped by immediate contingencies. Rule-governed behavior often involves delayed consequences, whereas contingency-shaped behavior is influenced by immediate, direct consequences. This delay in consequences may impact the effectiveness and efficiency of rule-governed behavior.

How is rule-governed behavior acquired?

Rule-governed behavior is acquired through verbal instruction and learning. Individuals are taught rules that describe the antecedent-behavior-consequence contingencies associated with specific behaviors. Through reinforcement and repetition, individuals learn to follow these rules and engage in rule-governed behavior.

Can rule-governed behavior be changed or modified?



Yes, rule-governed behavior can be changed or modified. Since it is influenced by verbal instructions, modifying the rules or providing new instructions can alter rule-governed behavior. However, changing rule-governed behavior may require careful consideration of the new contingencies and reinforcement processes involved.