Levels of Evidence in Nursing Research

Evidence-based practice is a cornerstone of nursing research, integrating the best available evidence with clinical expertise and patient values to guide decision-making in patient care. In order to assess the strength and quality of research evidence, various hierarchies or scales have been developed to classify levels of evidence in nursing research. These hierarchies provide a systematic approach to evaluating the reliability and validity of research studies, allowing nurses and healthcare professionals to make informed clinical decisions.

Evidence Hierarchy

One commonly used hierarchy to classify levels of evidence in nursing research is the one proposed by Polit and Beck. This hierarchy ranks evidence from level one (least biased) to level eight (most biased) based on the risk of bias. The levels of evidence in this hierarchy include:

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Well-designed RCTs
Well-designed controlled trials without randomization
Well-designed cohort or case-control studies
Systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies
Single descriptive or qualitative study
Opinions of authorities and expert committees
Personal opinions, anecdotes, and editorials

Types of Questions

It is important to note that different hierarchies exist for different types of research questions. For example, there are hierarchies specifically designed for therapy/intervention questions and prognosis questions. Each hierarchy considers different factors and study designs to assess the evidence. This ensures that the hierarchy used aligns with the specific research question being addressed.

Advantages of Levels of Evidence

Levels of evidence provide a structured approach to evaluating research studies in nursing. They offer several advantages, including:

Identification of high-quality evidence: Levels of evidence help identify the highest quality evidence available. For therapy questions, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the strongest form of evidence.
Improved decision-making: By considering the hierarchy of evidence, nurses and healthcare professionals can make more informed decisions about patient care, based on the best available evidence.
Standardization: Levels of evidence provide a standardized framework for evaluating research studies, promoting consistency and comparability across different studies and settings.

Limits of Levels of Evidence

While levels of evidence are valuable tools for evaluating research studies, they do have some limitations:

External validity: Levels of evidence may not fully consider external validity, which refers to the generalizability and applicability of study findings to real-world clinical practice settings.
Quality judgment: Levels of evidence do not provide a definitive judgment about the quality of evidence. In some cases, lower-level evidence may be stronger and more applicable to a specific clinical question than higher-level studies.

Other Grading Systems

In addition to the hierarchy proposed by Polit and Beck, there are other grading systems used in nursing research. For example, the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model ranks evidence from level I to level V, taking into account the quality, quantity, and consistency of the evidence. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) evidence level system also has its own ranking system, which considers the rigor and relevance of the evidence.

By utilizing these hierarchies and grading systems, nurses and healthcare professionals can critically appraise research studies and make evidence-based decisions that promote optimal patient outcomes.

Sources:

FAQs

What are the levels of evidence in nursing research?

Levels of evidence in nursing research refer to a systematic way of categorizing the strength and quality of research studies. They help healthcare professionals determine the reliability and applicability of the evidence to inform clinical decision-making. Here are some frequently asked questions about levels of evidence in nursing research:

What is the purpose of levels of evidence in nursing research?

Levels of evidence provide a structured approach to evaluating research studies in nursing. They help identify high-quality evidence, guide decision-making in patient care, and promote consistency and comparability across different studies and settings.

How are levels of evidence determined?

Levels of evidence are determined based on various hierarchies or scales that consider factors such as study design, risk of bias, and the type of research question being addressed. Different hierarchies exist for different types of research questions, ensuring that the hierarchy used aligns with the specific research question.

What are some commonly used hierarchies for levels of evidence in nursing research?

One commonly used hierarchy is the one proposed by Polit and Beck, which ranks evidence from level one (least biased) to level eight (most biased) based on the risk of bias. Other grading systems, such as the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) evidence level system, also have their own ranking systems.

What are the advantages of using levels of evidence in nursing research?

Levels of evidence offer several advantages, including identifying high-quality evidence such as meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), supporting informed decision-making in patient care, and providing a standardized framework for evaluating research studies.

What are the limitations of levels of evidence in nursing research?

While levels of evidence are valuable tools, they have some limitations. They may not fully consider external validity, which is the generalizability of study findings to real-world clinical practice settings. Additionally, levels of evidence do not provide a definitive judgment about the quality of evidence, and there may be cases where lower-level evidence is stronger than higher-level studies.

How can levels of evidence be used in clinical practice?

Levels of evidence can be used in clinical practice to critically appraise research studies and make evidence-based decisions. Healthcare professionals can consider the hierarchy of evidence when evaluating the strength and applicability of research findings to their specific patient population and clinical context.

Are levels of evidence applicable to all types of research questions in nursing?

No, different hierarchies exist for different types of research questions. For example, there are hierarchies specifically designed for therapy/intervention questions and prognosis questions. Each hierarchy considers different factors and study designs to assess the evidence.

Can levels of evidence change over time?

Yes, levels of evidence can change over time as new research emerges and the understanding of healthcare interventions evolves. It is important for healthcare professionals to stay updated with the latest evidence and revisions to the hierarchies or grading systems used in nursing research.