A systematic review attempts to gather all available empirical research by using clearly defined, systematic methods to obtain answers to a specific question. A meta-analysis is the statistical process of analyzing and combining results from several similar studies. 

What is a systematic review in research?

A systematic review is a summary of the medical literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and synthesize on a specific issue. It synthesizes the results of multiple primary studies related to each other by using strategies that reduce biases and random errors.

Is every meta-analysis a systematic review?

Not all systematic reviews include meta-analysis, but all meta-analyses are found in systematic reviews.
 

What is meta-analysis?

Meta-analysis is a quantitative, formal, epidemiological study design used to systematically assess the results of previous research to derive conclusions about that body of research. Typically, but not necessarily, the study is based on randomized, controlled clinical trials.

How do you review a systematic review and meta-analysis?

8 Stages of a Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

1. Formulate the review question.
2. Define inclusion and exclusion criteria.
3. Develop search strategy and locate studies.
4. Select studies.
5. Extract data.
6. Assess study quality.
7. Analyze and interpret results.
8. Disseminate findings.

What is an example of a meta-analysis?

Fictitious Example



The subjects from all eight studies (total: 860 subjects) were pooled and statistically analyzed to determine the effect of the relationship between wearing sunscreen and melanoma. This meta-analysis showed a 50% reduction in melanoma diagnosis among sunscreen-wearers.

What is the main purpose of a systematic review?

The purpose of a systematic review is to deliver a meticulous summary of all the available primary research in response to a research question. A systematic review uses all the existing research and is sometime called ‘secondary research’ (research on research).

What is the difference between systematic review vs meta-analysis?

A systematic review attempts to gather all available empirical research by using clearly defined, systematic methods to obtain answers to a specific question. A meta-analysis is the statistical process of analyzing and combining results from several similar studies.
 

What are the three types of systematic reviews?

Five other types of systematic reviews

• Scoping review. Preliminary assessment of the potential size and scope of available research literature.
• Rapid review.
• Narrative review.
• Meta-analysis.
• Mixed methods/mixed studies.

 

Can you do a meta-analysis without a systematic review?

Quote from video:

What is a systematic review in simple terms?

A systematic review is a complex piece of research that aims to identify, select and synthesise all research published on a particular question or topic. Systematic reviews adhere to a strict scientific design based on pre-specified and reproducible methods.

What is the difference between a systematic review and a literature review?

Literature reviews can be very simple or highly complex, and they can use a variety of methods for finding, assessing, and presenting evidence. A “systematic review” is a specific type of review that uses rigorous and transparent methods in an effort to summarize all of the available evidence with little to no bias.
 

What are 2 key features of a systematic review?

Key components of a systematic review include: Systematic and extensive searches to identify all the relevant published and unpublished literature. Study selection according to predefined eligibility criteria.